Back to all contracts

CORRIDOR MOBILITY PROGRAM BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN IDIQ PHASE 2

MUNIZ CONCRETE & CONTRACTING INC
Needs a closer lookTerm ended
Construction

This is a construction master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with MUNIZ CONCRETE & CONTRACTING INC to deliver “CORRIDOR MOBILITY PROGRAM BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN IDIQ PHASE 2”. The city authorized spending up to $10,000,000, and $2,375,773 has been paid so far (24% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$10,000,000
Ordered / committed
$3,610,329 (36%)
Actually paid
$2,375,773 (24%)
Timeline
Apr 14, 2022May 31, 2024 · ended 790 days ago

Why this status?

  • Contract period ended with only 24% paid — what happened to the rest?
  • Spending is behind schedule (100% of time elapsed, 24% paid).
  • High-dollar contract ($10,000,000) — worth periodic review.

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = CA220000009) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Capital Contracting Office
Delivered by (1 firm)
MUNIZ CONCRETE & CONTRACTING INC

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number CA220000009 (MA) · Department 6100 · Managed by Capital Contracting Office · Competitive Acquisition
From snapshot 2026-07-28.