Back to all contracts

REPAIR SERVICES FOR STEERING, SUSPENSION & ALIGNMENT

RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF TEXAS LP
also known as RUSH TRUCK CENTER SAN ANTONIO OR RUSH TRUCK CENTER AUSTIN
MonitorActive
Non-Professional Services

This is a non-professional services master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF TEXAS LP to deliver “REPAIR SERVICES FOR STEERING, SUSPENSION & ALIGNMENT”. The city authorized spending up to $312,000, and $42,071 has been paid so far (13% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$312,000
Ordered / committed
$74,392 (24%)
Actually paid
$42,071 (13%)
Timeline
Sep 10, 2022Sep 9, 2027 · 406 days remaining

Why this status?

  • Spending is behind schedule (78% of time elapsed, 13% paid).

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = NA220000128) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Central Purchasing Office Receptionist
Delivered by (1 firm)
RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF TEXAS LP

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number NA220000128 (MA) · Department 7800 · Managed by Central Purchasing Office Receptionist · Competitive Acquisition
From snapshot 2026-07-28.