Back to all contracts

ROCIP 8 ADMINISTRATOR AND INSURANCE SERVICES

MARSH USA INC
also known as MARSH USA OR MARSH WORTHAM
MonitorActive
Non-Professional Services

This is a non-professional services master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with MARSH USA INC to deliver “ROCIP 8 ADMINISTRATOR AND INSURANCE SERVICES”. The city authorized spending up to $12,812,000, and $1,527,571 has been paid so far (12% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$12,812,000
Ordered / committed
$3,117,142 (24%)
Actually paid
$1,527,571 (12%)
Timeline
Sep 19, 2022Sep 18, 2029 · 1,146 days remaining

Why this status?

  • Spending is behind schedule (55% of time elapsed, 12% paid).
  • High-dollar contract ($12,812,000) — worth periodic review.

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = NA220000169) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Central Purchasing Office Receptionist
Delivered by (1 firm)
MARSH USA INC

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number NA220000169 (MA) · Department 5800 · Managed by Central Purchasing Office Receptionist · Competitive Acquisition
From snapshot 2026-07-28.