Back to all contracts

EMERGENCY PATIENT EQUIPMENT REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES

HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP
also known as STRYKER SALES LLC OR STRYKER MEDICAL
Needs a closer lookTerm ended
Sole and Single Source

This is a sole and single source master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP to deliver “EMERGENCY PATIENT EQUIPMENT REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES”. The city authorized spending up to $1,030,000, and $91,400 has been paid so far (9% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$1,030,000
Ordered / committed
$139,416 (14%)
Actually paid
$91,400 (9%)
Timeline
Dec 13, 2022Dec 12, 2025 · ended 230 days ago

Why this status?

  • Contract period ended with only 9% paid — what happened to the rest?
  • Spending is behind schedule (100% of time elapsed, 9% paid).

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = NS220000116) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Central Purchasing Office Receptionist
Delivered by (1 firm)
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number NS220000116 (MA) · Department 9300 · Managed by Central Purchasing Office Receptionist · Sole Source > $5000
From snapshot 2026-07-28.