Back to all contracts

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ROTATION LIST 2010-2012 FOR P.W.

URS CORP +8 firms on this agreement
NominalTerm ended
Professional Services

This is a professional services master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with URS CORP to deliver “ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ROTATION LIST 2010-2012 FOR P.W.”. The city authorized spending up to $7,200,000, and $6,515,553 has been paid so far (90% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$7,200,000
Ordered / committed
$6,864,583 (95%)
Actually paid
$6,515,553 (90%)
Timeline
Mar 11, 2010Dec 31, 2023 · ended 942 days ago

Why this status?

  • No attention signals triggered.

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = PA100000043) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Contract and Land Management Department
Delivered by (9 firms)
URS CORP +8 more on this rotation list
  • URS CORP
  • APTIM CORP.
  • APTIM GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
  • WESTON SOLUTIONS INC
  • WOOD ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, INC.
  • AMEC GEOMATRIX INC
  • INTERA, INC
  • APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, LLC
  • TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

This is a multi-firm agreement (a “rotation list”): 9 firms share one contract number and one spending ceiling. The dollar figures above are the agreement total, counted once — not per firm.

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number PA100000043 (MA) · Department 6100 · Managed by Contract and Land Management Department · Competitive Acquisition
From snapshot 2026-07-28.