Back to all contracts

2015 FLOOD HAZARD MITIGATION ROTATION LIST

AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC +12 firms on this agreement
MonitorTerm ended
Sole and Single Source

This is a sole and single source master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC to deliver “2015 FLOOD HAZARD MITIGATION ROTATION LIST”. The city authorized spending up to $15,000,000, and $12,612,802 has been paid so far (84% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$15,000,000
Ordered / committed
$14,194,345 (95%)
Actually paid
$12,612,802 (84%)
Timeline
Aug 13, 2015Dec 31, 2024 · ended 576 days ago

Why this status?

  • High-dollar contract ($15,000,000) — worth periodic review.

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = PA160000003) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Contract and Land Management Department
Delivered by (13 firms)
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC +12 more on this rotation list
  • AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC
  • ESPEY CONSULTANTS INC
  • FREESE AND NICHOLS INC
  • CHAN & PARTNERS ENGINEERING LLC
  • BGE, INC
  • CAS CONSULTING AND SERVICES, INC.
  • DOUCET & ASSOCIATES INC
  • HDR ENGINEERING INC
  • K FRIESE & ASSOC INC
  • RPS INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
  • HALFF ASSOCIATES INC
  • LOCKWOOD ANDREWS & NEWNAM INC
  • H.W. LOCHNER, INC.

This is a multi-firm agreement (a “rotation list”): 13 firms share one contract number and one spending ceiling. The dollar figures above are the agreement total, counted once — not per firm.

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number PA160000003 (MA) · Department 6100 · Managed by Contract and Land Management Department · Pers / Prof / Plan Svcs (252)
From snapshot 2026-07-28.