Back to all contracts

2018 CORRIDOR PROGRAM ENGINEERING SERVICES ROTATION LIST

CP&Y INC +10 firms on this agreement
also known as STV INFRASTRUCTURE
MonitorTerm ended
Sole and Single Source

This is a sole and single source master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with CP&Y INC to deliver “2018 CORRIDOR PROGRAM ENGINEERING SERVICES ROTATION LIST”. The city authorized spending up to $115,000,000, and $96,093,332 has been paid so far (84% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$115,000,000
Ordered / committed
$111,460,417 (97%)
Actually paid
$96,093,332 (84%)
Timeline
Apr 27, 2018Apr 26, 2025 · ended 460 days ago

Why this status?

  • High-dollar contract ($115,000,000) — worth periodic review.

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = PA180000027) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Capital Contracting Office
Delivered by (11 firms)
CP&Y INC +10 more on this rotation list
  • CP&Y INC
  • DEC - CENTRAL TEXAS, LLC
  • AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC
  • ALLIANCE TRANSPORTATION GROUP LLC
  • BINKLEY & BARFIELD INC
  • BGE, INC
  • CDM SMITH INC
  • FREESE AND NICHOLS INC
  • HALFF ASSOCIATES INC
  • KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC
  • LOCKWOOD ANDREWS & NEWNAM INC

This is a multi-firm agreement (a “rotation list”): 11 firms share one contract number and one spending ceiling. The dollar figures above are the agreement total, counted once — not per firm.

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number PA180000027 (MA) · Department 6100 · Managed by Capital Contracting Office · Pers / Prof / Plan Svcs (252)
From snapshot 2026-07-28.