Back to all contracts

2019 SMALL DIAMETER W & WW PIPELINE ENGINEERING RL

TETRA TECH INC +10 firms on this agreement
MonitorTerm ended
Professional Services

This is a professional services master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with TETRA TECH INC to deliver “2019 SMALL DIAMETER W & WW PIPELINE ENGINEERING RL”. The city authorized spending up to $8,400,000, and $4,386,045 has been paid so far (52% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$8,400,000
Ordered / committed
$6,298,940 (75%)
Actually paid
$4,386,045 (52%)
Timeline
Nov 14, 2019Dec 31, 2023 · ended 942 days ago

Why this status?

  • Spending is behind schedule (100% of time elapsed, 52% paid).

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = PA200000014) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Capital Contracting Office
Delivered by (11 firms)
TETRA TECH INC +10 more on this rotation list
  • TETRA TECH INC
  • VICKREY & ASSOC LLC
  • KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS INC
  • WALKER PARTNERS, LLC
  • WESTON SOLUTIONS INC
  • COBB FENDLEY & ASSOC INC
  • MWM DESIGNGROUP INC
  • MILLER GRAY LLC
  • RILEY MOUNTAIN ENGINEERING LLC
  • DOUCET & ASSOCIATES INC
  • HDR ENGINEERING INC

This is a multi-firm agreement (a “rotation list”): 11 firms share one contract number and one spending ceiling. The dollar figures above are the agreement total, counted once — not per firm.

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number PA200000014 (MA) · Department 6100 · Managed by Capital Contracting Office · Competitive Acquisition
From snapshot 2026-07-28.