Back to all contracts

2022 LARGE DIAMETER W&WW PIPELINE ENG SERVICES ROTATION LIST

BGE, INC +11 firms on this agreement
also known as BROWN & GAY ENGINEERS INC
Needs a closer lookTerm ended
Professional Services

This is a professional services master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with BGE, INC to deliver “2022 LARGE DIAMETER W&WW PIPELINE ENG SERVICES ROTATION LIST”. The city authorized spending up to $24,000,000, and $954,325 has been paid so far (4% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$24,000,000
Ordered / committed
$5,999,353 (25%)
Actually paid
$954,325 (4%)
Timeline
Aug 8, 2022Dec 31, 2025 · ended 211 days ago

Why this status?

  • Contract period ended with only 4% paid — what happened to the rest?
  • Spending is behind schedule (100% of time elapsed, 4% paid).
  • High-dollar contract ($24,000,000) — worth periodic review.

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = PA220000067) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Capital Contracting Office
Delivered by (12 firms)
BGE, INC +11 more on this rotation list
  • BGE, INC
  • CDM SMITH INC
  • CAS CONSULTING AND SERVICES, INC.
  • LOCKWOOD ANDREWS & NEWNAM INC
  • PAPE-DAWSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC
  • CP&Y INC
  • AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC
  • FREESE AND NICHOLS INC
  • JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC
  • K FRIESE & ASSOC INC
  • PARSONS WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE INC
  • H.W. LOCHNER, INC.

This is a multi-firm agreement (a “rotation list”): 12 firms share one contract number and one spending ceiling. The dollar figures above are the agreement total, counted once — not per firm.

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number PA220000067 (MA) · Department 6100 · Managed by Capital Contracting Office · Competitive Acquisition
From snapshot 2026-07-28.