Back to all contracts

2022 INSPECTION & ANALYSIS OF POWER GENERATION FACILITIES RL

INTERTEK USA, INC. +1 firms on this agreement
also known as INTERTEK AIM
Needs a closer lookTerm ended
Sole and Single Source

This is a sole and single source master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with INTERTEK USA, INC. to deliver “2022 INSPECTION & ANALYSIS OF POWER GENERATION FACILITIES RL”. The city authorized spending up to $6,000,000, and $34,936 has been paid so far (1% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$6,000,000
Ordered / committed
$54,530 (1%)
Actually paid
$34,936 (1%)
Timeline
Aug 10, 2022Aug 9, 2025 · ended 355 days ago

Why this status?

  • Contract period ended with only 1% paid — what happened to the rest?
  • Spending is behind schedule (100% of time elapsed, 1% paid).

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = PA220000120) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Capital Contracting Office
Delivered by (2 firms)
INTERTEK USA, INC. +1 more on this rotation list
  • INTERTEK USA, INC.
  • METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES INC

This is a multi-firm agreement (a “rotation list”): 2 firms share one contract number and one spending ceiling. The dollar figures above are the agreement total, counted once — not per firm.

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number PA220000120 (MA) · Department 6100 · Managed by Capital Contracting Office · Pers / Prof / Plan Svcs (252)
From snapshot 2026-07-28.