Back to all contracts

2022 BUILDING COMMISSION (CX) SERVICES ROTATION LIST

TEXAS ENERGY ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. +8 firms on this agreement
also known as TEESI ENGINEERING
Needs a closer lookTerm ended
Professional Services

This is a professional services master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with TEXAS ENERGY ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. to deliver “2022 BUILDING COMMISSION (CX) SERVICES ROTATION LIST”. The city authorized spending up to $10,000,000, and $68,140 has been paid so far (1% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$10,000,000
Ordered / committed
$732,664 (7%)
Actually paid
$68,140 (1%)
Timeline
Feb 16, 2023Dec 31, 2025 · ended 211 days ago

Why this status?

  • Contract period ended with only 1% paid — what happened to the rest?
  • Spending is behind schedule (100% of time elapsed, 1% paid).
  • High-dollar contract ($10,000,000) — worth periodic review.

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = PA230000026) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Capital Contracting Office
Delivered by (9 firms)
TEXAS ENERGY ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. +8 more on this rotation list
  • TEXAS ENERGY ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
  • LCCX LLC
  • NODAL PARTNERS, LLC
  • COMMAND COMMISSIONING LLC
  • JASMINE ENGINEERING INC
  • PAGE SOUTHERLAND PAGE, INC.
  • ENERGY ENGINEERING ASSOC INC
  • GOODWIN ENGINEERING INC
  • SEBESTA INC.

This is a multi-firm agreement (a “rotation list”): 9 firms share one contract number and one spending ceiling. The dollar figures above are the agreement total, counted once — not per firm.

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number PA230000026 (MA) · Department 6100 · Managed by Capital Contracting Office · Competitive Acquisition
From snapshot 2026-07-28.