Back to all contracts

WALNUT CREEK WWTP CONTROL SYSTEMS UPGRADE

HARUTUNIAN ENGINEERING INC
Needs a closer lookTerm ended
Sole and Single Source

This is a sole and single source master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with HARUTUNIAN ENGINEERING INC to deliver “WALNUT CREEK WWTP CONTROL SYSTEMS UPGRADE”. The city authorized spending up to $5,327,552, and $1,873,809 has been paid so far (35% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$5,327,552
Ordered / committed
$5,327,552 (100%)
Actually paid
$1,873,809 (35%)
Timeline
Apr 27, 2017Dec 31, 2025 · ended 211 days ago

Why this status?

  • Contract period ended with only 35% paid — what happened to the rest?
  • Fully committed but $3,453,743 ordered is not yet paid — is the work being delivered?
  • Spending is behind schedule (100% of time elapsed, 35% paid).

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = SA170000010) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Capital Contracting Office
Delivered by (1 firm)
HARUTUNIAN ENGINEERING INC

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number SA170000010 (MA) · Department 6100 · Managed by Capital Contracting Office · Pers / Prof / Plan Svcs (252)
From snapshot 2026-07-28.