Back to all contracts

STREET DESIGN STAFF AUGMENTATION (SIT-IN CONSULTANT)

TOOLE DESIGN GROUP, LLC
NominalTerm ended
Sole and Single Source

This is a sole and single source master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with TOOLE DESIGN GROUP, LLC to deliver “Street Design Staff Augmentation (Sit-In Consultant)”. The city authorized spending up to $8,000,000, and $7,580,737 has been paid so far (95% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$8,000,000
Ordered / committed
$7,978,940 (100%)
Actually paid
$7,580,737 (95%)
Timeline
Nov 13, 2017Dec 31, 2024 · ended 576 days ago

Why this status?

  • No attention signals triggered.

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = SA180000003) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Capital Contracting Office
Delivered by (1 firm)
TOOLE DESIGN GROUP, LLC

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Project (city records)
Street Design Staff Augmentation (Sit-In Consultant)
Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number SA180000003 (MA) · Department 6100 · Managed by Capital Contracting Office · Pers / Prof / Plan Svcs (252)
From snapshot 2026-07-28.