Back to all contracts

PSA FOR MEXICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER PHASE 2

MIRO RIVERA-TATIANA BILBAO LLC
also known as MIRO RIVERA-TATIANA BILBAO
Needs a closer lookTerm ended
Other Contracting

This is a other contracting master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with MIRO RIVERA-TATIANA BILBAO LLC to deliver “PSA FOR MEXICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER PHASE 2”. The city authorized spending up to $4,090,531, and $2,706,788 has been paid so far (66% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$4,090,531
Ordered / committed
$4,090,531 (100%)
Actually paid
$2,706,788 (66%)
Timeline
Nov 16, 2020Jun 30, 2025 · ended 395 days ago

Why this status?

  • Fully committed but $1,383,743 ordered is not yet paid — is the work being delivered?

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = SA210000004) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Capital Contracting Office
Delivered by (1 firm)
MIRO RIVERA-TATIANA BILBAO LLC

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number SA210000004 (MA) · Department 6100 · Managed by Capital Contracting Office · Alt Proc Method (252)
From snapshot 2026-07-28.