Back to all contracts

AUSTIN WATER BARON SOCO RECLAIMED WATER MAIN

K FRIESE & ASSOC INC +1 firms on this agreement
Needs a closer lookTerm ended
Sole and Single Source

This is a sole and single source master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with K FRIESE & ASSOC INC to deliver “AUSTIN WATER BARON SOCO RECLAIMED WATER MAIN”. The city authorized spending up to $1,029,978, and $356,474 has been paid so far (35% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$1,029,978
Ordered / committed
$1,029,978 (100%)
Actually paid
$356,474 (35%)
Timeline
Apr 29, 2021Apr 28, 2024 · ended 823 days ago

Why this status?

  • Contract period ended with only 35% paid — what happened to the rest?
  • Spending is behind schedule (100% of time elapsed, 35% paid).

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = SA210000017) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Capital Contracting Office
Delivered by (2 firms)
K FRIESE & ASSOC INC +1 more on this rotation list
  • K FRIESE & ASSOC INC
  • H.W. LOCHNER, INC.

This is a multi-firm agreement (a “rotation list”): 2 firms share one contract number and one spending ceiling. The dollar figures above are the agreement total, counted once — not per firm.

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number SA210000017 (MA) · Department 6100 · Managed by Capital Contracting Office · Pers / Prof / Plan Svcs (252)
From snapshot 2026-07-28.