Back to all contracts

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR ADEP AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION

RS&H, INC.
also known as RS&H
Needs a closer lookActive
Sole and Single Source

This is a sole and single source master agreement (a spending ceiling drawn down over time via delivery orders) with RS&H, INC. to deliver “PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR ADEP AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION”. The city authorized spending up to $8,012,834, and $3,356,846 has been paid so far (42% of the ceiling).

Authorized (spending ceiling)
$8,012,834
Ordered / committed
$8,012,834 (100%)
Actually paid
$3,356,846 (42%)
Timeline
Sep 7, 2022Jul 31, 2026 · 1 days remaining

Why this status?

  • Fully committed but $4,655,989 ordered is not yet paid — is the work being delivered?
  • Expiring within 1 days.
  • Spending is behind schedule (100% of time elapsed, 42% paid).

These are transparent signals, not judgments. A large unspent balance may be a legitimate multi-year ceiling or indefinite-delivery contract.

Payments on this contract

No checkbook payments are booked directly against this contract number yet. This can happen when the work is paid through delivery orders under a master agreement (not directly linked here), or when payments simply haven’t started.

Linked via the contract number appearing as a payment’s source document (rf_doc_id = SA220000022) in the Austin checkbook. See all payments to this vendor →

Accountability

Administered by
Capital Contracting Office
Delivered by (1 firm)
RS&H, INC.

We couldn’t automatically match this contract to a City Council vote (the voting-record dataset starts in 2023, and older or consent-agenda items may not match by name). Most contracts are approved collectively on the Council consent agenda — so accountability runs through the managing department above and the Council vote on the award date, not an individual sponsor.

Documents & oversight

Contract type
Master agreement — a spending ceiling drawn down through individual delivery orders over time.

Assessing delivery vs. commitment: Austin doesn’t publish structured project milestones, so we can’t auto-verify that the work matches the contract. What we can do is show what the money was invoiced for (above) and link the approved scope — then, where it matters, dispatch a Spotter to confirm the work on the ground. Contracts whose purpose is well-documented vs. vague is exactly the signal that tells us where to look first.

Source & provenance

Contract number SA220000022 (MA) · Department 6100 · Managed by Capital Contracting Office · Pers / Prof / Plan Svcs (252)
From snapshot 2026-07-28.