84ih-p28jA contract’s funding source is traced from the real checkbook funds its payments drew on — not guessed from its title. When one source is at least 60% of the dollars, we label it; otherwise it stays “Mixed / untraced” rather than mislabel a multi-fund master agreement.
Most checks reference a delivery order, which points at a downstream order rather than back to its master agreement — a known City-data linkage gap. So a payment can be clearly bucketed on the Recent big checks view (every check names its own fund) yet its parent contract here reads “Mixed.” That payment-first view classifies a higher share of dollars for exactly this reason.
Self-supporting services paid by user fees — water, energy, airport, trash.
Examples: Austin Water, Austin Energy, Airport (ABIA), Resource Recovery, Watershed/Drainage
Scope note: this tracks money out (spending), not revenue. General-Fund spend is only partly visible here — we see it where it flows through vendors (e.g. Parks maintenance), not payroll. The fund types follow the City of Austin’s governmental fund accounting; scale figures are approximate, as of FY2026.